Page 1 of 1
how good are the 4 cylanders
Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 7:18 pm
by broncojeremy
do the 4 cylanders suck or what i dont see any thing about them here just wondering what yall thought about them
Re: how good are the 4 cylanders
Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 12:58 am
by Ranger Dave
broncojeremy wrote: i dont see any thing about them
cause they were never in a B2
Re: how good are the 4 cylanders
Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 7:40 pm
by broncojeremy
do they suck or what i was thinking the diesel
Re: how good are the 4 cylanders
Posted: Sat Nov 14, 2009 4:33 am
by cajun66
Rare as hen's teeth. I've had a couple of the Mitsubishi turbo diesels (Not in the Bronco 2) that were great motors. But I would think they would be under powered for the B2. Probably why they weren't common. Now a Detroit 453 turbo would be nice.
Re: how good are the 4 cylanders
Posted: Sat Nov 14, 2009 4:37 am
by cajun66
P.S. it's spelled "cylinder".
Peace.
Re: how good are the 4 cylanders
Posted: Sat Nov 14, 2009 2:11 pm
by tekatlarge
The 4 Cylinder engine that was a rare exception was a diesel 4 Cylinder. If my memory serves me right it was a diesel version of the 2.3.
The ford 2.3 is a 4 cylinder that was used in Rangers and of course our beloved death trap pintos. There are a lot of speed parts available and some of them 4 cylinders kick some very serious ass. Turbo ed or supercharged these motors are unbelievable for Hp!
Look up racer Walsh on line they used to be my supplier for make um go fast 2.3 parts.