1989 5.0L engine or 1973 5.0L engine
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 1:20 am
well I just got myself into a bit of a pickle, I origanally purchased a 1973 302 with 84000 origanal miles to put into my B2, and now I just got a 1989 302 paid $100, bought it for the complete serpintene belt setup, well as it sits it's a complete motor, injectors, wiring harness, upper air intake, everything. I was looking a bit closer at it and it has a tag on it from a local machine shop, called them up and they told me the engine was rebuilt 9 months ago. so my predicament is now do I go with injected motor or go with the carbed motor. I know the Carbed one would be easier but the injected one would be nice
the 89 302 was pulled out of a full size Bronco, the guy pulled it to put one of those 4 cylinder Cummins turbo deisels. said the motor ran strong just wanted to go with the deisel. (ofcourse that's if you believe him, I do)
I know if I go with the injected one I would still need to find a computer, and figure out the wiring
Or should I just go with the Carbed one and put a Holly projection setup on it at a later date??
Or is there something else about the 89 302 that I don't know that would cause problems?
What do you guys think. go with the 1989 injected 302 or the 1973 carbed 302?? any advise would be appreciated.

the 89 302 was pulled out of a full size Bronco, the guy pulled it to put one of those 4 cylinder Cummins turbo deisels. said the motor ran strong just wanted to go with the deisel. (ofcourse that's if you believe him, I do)
I know if I go with the injected one I would still need to find a computer, and figure out the wiring
Or should I just go with the Carbed one and put a Holly projection setup on it at a later date??
Or is there something else about the 89 302 that I don't know that would cause problems?
What do you guys think. go with the 1989 injected 302 or the 1973 carbed 302?? any advise would be appreciated.