2.3 bell housing

Ask technical questions about your Ford Bronco II here. Technical write-ups on your axle swaps, engine swaps, chop tops, etc. are encouraged.
Post Reply
mccutcheon4
Posts: 153
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 8:27 am
Location: PNW

2.3 bell housing

Post by mccutcheon4 »

Does the 2.8 V6 and the 2.3 I-4 take the same bell housing ? Being they are Fords I'm betting the don't interchange.
I'm not a Chev person,but one thing Chev had its stuff together on was the bell housing pattern. 153 C.I. four cylinder though 454 V8 and every thing in between had the same pattern on the back of the blocks.
DBrown
Posts: 1545
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 5:21 am
Location: Bowling Green, KY

Post by DBrown »

no, they are different...
71 Bronco - twin sticked, full width, 2" lift, wristed arm, lots of rust...

http://www.catalystcycles.com
mccutcheon4
Posts: 153
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 8:27 am
Location: PNW

Post by mccutcheon4 »

I figured they were each unique. Does the 4-speed in an 84 Bronco2 have a different pattern on the transmission side of the bell housing than the 5-speed that came in the newer Bronco 2s ?




Thanks
DBrown
Posts: 1545
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 5:21 am
Location: Bowling Green, KY

Post by DBrown »

the 2.8l, 2.9l, and 4.0l all share the same bell housing pattern. I would not recommend using some of the 2.8l/2.9l trannies on the 4.0l but they do swap. what exactly are you trying to do?
71 Bronco - twin sticked, full width, 2" lift, wristed arm, lots of rust...

http://www.catalystcycles.com
mccutcheon4
Posts: 153
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 8:27 am
Location: PNW

Post by mccutcheon4 »

Possibly Bolting a 2.3 up to the Bronco transmission. I know Ford made a 2.3 powered 4X4 Ranger. From looking at previous posts it looks like there were several types of manual transmissions used.
ranger5.0
Posts: 743
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2005 8:10 pm
Location: Granite Falls, Wa
Contact:

Post by ranger5.0 »

besides the 2.3 to v-6 pattern are different, the 2.3 starter is on the right side and the v-6's is on the left.
EBSteve just likes to watch me break things.:-)
420HP and 775Ft lbs Now it is time to break things.
DBrown
Posts: 1545
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 5:21 am
Location: Bowling Green, KY

Post by DBrown »

you could bolt a 2.3l into your BII with the tranny you want to use but IMO it would be a step in the wrong direction...unless you had a turbo motor. one thing I will say about the 2.3 is they are hard to kill and you can find them every where. the down fall is I think you will get worse gas milage because of the weight of the truck...it would kind of be like a 302 in an old 70's pick up, ask me how my milage is...it will scare you.
71 Bronco - twin sticked, full width, 2" lift, wristed arm, lots of rust...

http://www.catalystcycles.com
mccutcheon4
Posts: 153
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 8:27 am
Location: PNW

Post by mccutcheon4 »

Dbrown, the 2.3 in a Bronco2 idea goes back to my posts about putting a Ranger cab on a B2 frame. We have a parts B2 and a complete very beat up Ranger that is powered by a good running 2.3 so........ I have had several SVO 2.3 powered rigs and like you said the motors are tough. I don't think I would turbo this lash-up though, I have a eaton
supercharger off a 3.8 SC bird that I was eyeballing for this combination. The eaton requires a wider than normal belt though. I haven't quite figured how I would deal with that yet. Anyway this is something I would do down the road. V8 Ranger is first.
Post Reply